Ju Wenjun and Kateryna Lagno become the first semi-finalists of the Championship

   |   By  |  0 Comments

The return games of the Quarterfinals were played on November 13 in the Ugra Chess Academy.

Lei Tingjie and Kateryna Lagno entered a complex Ruy Lopez position. According to the Russian, Lei surprised her in the opening, however, Black managed to obtain a harmonious position. The Chinese made a mistake in a time trouble, and was forced to part with material. Lagno gradually overcame the resistance, won the second game as well and advanced to the semi-final.

Ju Wenjun won as Black against Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova. The World Champion found the strongest continuation in the position with opposite side castling, after which White had to give up a pawn. Later White made another mistake and lost even more material, however, in a clearly winning position Ju Wenjun made a mistake herself, giving White significant drawing chances. Still, Tokhirjonova’s defense of the resulting endgame was not precise, and Black eventually won this dramatic game. Ju Wenjun also proceeded to the semi-final.

Mariya Muzychuk once again showed her incredible fighting spirit, winning as Black against Zhansaya Abdumalik to equalize the match score. After the opening Muzychuk sacrificed an exchange for a pawn. The bishop pair gave Black sufficient compensation, and Muzychuk gradually outplayed her opponent in the middlegame. Abdumalik had to return the material with interest, but there was no way out for White. This match will continue on tie-break tomorrow.

Anna Muzychuk and Alexandra Kosteniuk made a second draw and will also play the tie-break.

 

The tie-break will start with two games with rapid time control: 25 minutes plus 10 second per move. If the match is still tied, it will continue with two slow blitz games – 10 minutes plus 10 seconds per move. After that, if the winner is still not determined, two 5+3 blitz games will follow. Finally, those matches that are still tied, will proceed to the Armageddon game.

 

Tie-break pairings:

A. Kosteniuk – A. Muzychuk

Z. Abdumalik – M. Muzychuk

All players in the Semifinal except the future champion qualify for the 2019 Women’s Candidates Tournament

Pairings and results 

Photos 

Videos 

 

Evgeniy Najer: Who said we would have a new champion?

   |   By  |  0 Comments

Grandmaster Evgeniy Najer successfully works in women chess – he is strong grandmaster and a coach of the Russian women’s national team. He is also an excellent chess commentator. These days he is responsible for the Russian-speaking broadcasting from Khanty-Mansiysk. Those of you who understand Russian are welcome to watch his insightful streams, and for the rest of you we summed up Evgeniy’s impressions from the championship in one interview.

– Evgeniy, you joined the broadcasting team in the Round 3, but have you followed the championship from the beginning?

– Since I have known about this assignment well in advance, and being a coach of the women’s national team, I obviously followed it from the start. However, it is easier for me to discuss the things I saw during my stay here.

– What are you first impressions? Surprises, disappointments?..

– The tournament is very strong and intriguing. There are many complexand fighting games – which is quite usual. Judging by the lineup of the Quarterfinals, most of the favorites confirmed their status – first and foremost, the reigning World Champion Ju Wenjun, also Kateryna Lagno, Alexandra Kosteniuk, and Muzychuk sisters, Anna and Mariya. Some of the strong players have been eliminated – Tan Zhongyi, Humpy Koneru, Harika Dronavalli, Nana Dzagnidze, Aleksandra Goryachkina, and a few others.

– Are there any new names for you?

– There are some. The young Mobina Alinasab from Iran left a strong impression with her play. In the 3rd Round she faced Mariya Muzychuk and had reasonable chances to come through. We all should remember her name.

It goes without saying that very fewpeople expected such a powerful play from Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova from Uzbekistan. Just think about it: she knocked out Alina Kashlinskaya, Tan Zhongyi, and Valentina Gunina! Such a feat would be hard to repeat for many male grandmasters, and would be considered a serious achievement for anybody. Tokhirjonova had a very strong opposition and managed to advance quite far, which is remarkable. Now she faces the World Champion. If she knocks out Ju Wenjun as well, it will be a hugesensation.

Zhansaya Abdumalik is in my opinion one of the hidden favorites of the championship. Her overall victory will not be too surprising. Despite her tender age, her play has been very strong for quite a while.

– What is your impression from overall quality of the games?

– I have mixed feelings. Generally, it is not different from other tournaments of similar level. The level of play is solid, the quality of games is quite high. Particularly Ju Wenjun looks like a player without weaknesses. Others are somewhat less consistent with their play.

– Is Ju Wenjun the main favorite of the championship then?

– Although this is a knock-out event, the question whether we’ll have a new champion is legitimate. Right now I can’t imagine who can beat her or how they’ll do it. She plays very good chess and has excellent nerves. However, she is yet to play some of the main contenders, and nobody knows how their clash may end.

– Who is the main favorite for playing Ju Wenjun in the final?

– I do not dare predicting it. There are quite a few possible alternatives.

– What is the critical factor of success in a knock-out event?

– The overall success in knock-out events is largely dependent on how strong is your rapid chess. Yes, good nerves and ability to handle stress are also quite important, but strong rapid chess skill is the key.

– Being the national team coach, do you pay special attention for the Russian participants?

– Naturally, I watch them very closely, but I do not pay them extra attention as a commentator.

– How comfortable are you at the commentary booth?

– This is still a relatively new role for me. I am not completely at home sitting there alone, I prefer towork in tandem with another commentator. Then I have time to analyze the position and understand what is happening, while being alone I have to talk all the time – and this is not easy at all.

– Is it important for acommentator to give precise evaluations, or should he live through each game emotionally together with the audience?

– Do not forget that I am a player and coach first, and only then a commentator. So when I overlook that a queen wins against a passed pawn, as it happened in Kosteniuk – Harika, I feel dread. I want to succeed in everything. The required skill set overlaps with the one of a strong blitz player. Still, I enjoy this kind of work and will continue doing commentary.

– Do you consult with engines during games?

– No, because it obstructs my thinking. When I see the computer line I trust it too much and suppress my own ideas, which may be of some interest. I am unable to synchronize myself with the engine, therefore I don’t do it.

 

 

Round 4: Kateryna Lagno and Zhansaya Abdumalik begin with victories

  |   By  |  0 Comments

The Quarterfinals of the Women’s World Chess Championship started in Khanty-Mansiysk on November 12.

Kateryna Lagno celebrated a convincing victory over Lei Tingjie. The Chinese player went for a very passive opening setup as Black. White gradually developed her advantage and kept pushing even after the exchange of queens, utilizing her strong bishop pair. After white rooks broke to the 7th rank, Black’s position became totally lost. 

Former World Champion Mariya Muzychuk, playing White, lost to the 18-year-old Zhansaya Abdumalik. The Ukrainian sacrificed a pawn for the initiative and soon regained the material with interest. However, holding onto the extra pawn was difficult because of the insecure position of her king. Abdumalik utilized a first clear inaccuracy of her opponent, delivering a nice tactical shot. Muzychuk lost a piece and resigned on the 57th move.

A. Kosteniuk-A. Muzychuk ended in a draw. In the Sveshnikov/Chelyabinsk variation of the Sicilian, Black sacrificed a pawn, obtaining sufficient counterplay in return. A draw was agreed after series of exchanges.

Another rising star of the championship, Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova successfully held as Black against Ju Wenjun. The World Champion had an advantage after the opening, but it somehow evaporated in the middlegame. The resulting rook ending with an extra pawn to White was drawn, and the players signed a peace treaty soon after the control move.

The second games of the round will be played on November 13, the tie-breaks will follow on the next day.

All the semifinalists except the future champion will qualify for the upcoming 2019 Women’s Candidates Tournament.

Pairings and results 

Photos 

Videos 

 

Anatoly Bykhovsky: Junior chess is booming worldwide

   |   By  |  0 Comments

Anatoly Bykhovsky, Honored Trainer of USSR, International Arbiter, and member of the Appeals Committee at the Women’s World Championship, met with 18 chess teachers of Khanty-Mansiysk schools and the Ugra Chess Academy. They discussed development of junior chess, demand for teaching chess as a part of the school curriculum, and participation in the Open All-Russian competition Belaya Ladya. The final tournament of the Belaya Ladya celebrates its 50th anniversary next year.

Anatoly Avraamovich noted that he did not want to give a lecture, but wanted to exchange thoughts on the current state of junior chess. To underscore the dynamic changes in junior chess, Mr. Bykhovsky recalled that when he was starting his chess career, there were no international junior events at all, and even a couple of decades later the chess calendar only featured a biennial U20 championship – a sharp contrast with numerous junior and scholastic events of the modern day. “Junior chess is booming, not only in Russia, but worldwide”, summed up Mr. Bykhovsky. “Chess comes to schools, funding keeps growing – everything is great. However, it is important to organize the work and develop the right strategy”.

The greater part of the meeting was dedicated to the history and development of the Belaya Ladya. Anatoly Bykhovsky was one of the founding fathers of the competition, and shared his conceptual view: “I realized that chess must be promoted with a competition that will draw everyone’s attention. I expected the Belaya Ladya to get an impulse from schoolchildren who take part in it, not from above.”

The tournament exists for nearly 50 years, and its final became international in 2015. The number of participants from abroad is growing each year, but Mr. Bykhovsky has an even more ambitious dream – to carry out the World Scholastic Chess Olympiad some day.

During the concluding part of the meeting, Mr. Bykhovsky exchanged ideas with the audience. They touched upon various scholastic chess topics, from teaching chess at schools to organizing the Belaya Ladya qualifying tournaments. In the end Anatoly Avraamovich received a commemorative gift from the Ugra Chess Academy.

Round 3 Review

   |   By  |  0 Comments

At the previous stage, 50 % of the matches had ended in tie-breaks; in the third round, their number increased to 75%. The struggle in the tie-breaks was more vigorous as well: in 2 matches out of 8, 25-minute games were not enough to determine a winner.

 

The reigning World Champion’s advance into quarterfinals was the most confident of them all. Playing with Black in the first game against Zhai Mo, Ju Wenjun had easily solved her opening problems, then refuted the exchange sacrifice attempted by her fellow countrywoman precisely and realized her advantage. In the return duel, Ju played out the leak-proof Maroczy Bind, not giving her opponent a single chance at sharpening the play.

 

The only other player to secure an extra day-off for herself was M. Muzychuk. However, in the first game against sensational Alinasab, the former World Champion escaped by a hair. Having deviated from theoretical mainline in the Chelyabinsk Variation, Muzychuk did not show activity in the center on time and found herself a pawn down in a bad position. After the game transposed into a queen ending, the Iranian successfully managed to hide her king from checks for a long time, while simultaneously pushing her outside pawn.

 

M. Alinasab–M. Muzychuk

 

 

Actually, Alinasab was one accurate move away from win – 49.Kh2! and so on, for example, 49…Qxe3 (49…Qe1 50.Qxf6) 50.Qg6+ Kd7 51.h7 Qf4+ 52.Kh3 Qe3+ 53.g3 Qg1 54.Qg7+ Kd6 55.Qxf6+ Kd5 56.h8Q.

White was too hasty with advancing her pawn, and after 49.h7? Qh1+ 50.Kg3 Qe1+ 51.Kg4 Qd1+ 52.Kg3 Qe1+ 53.Kf4 Qf1+ 54.Kxe4 Qc4+!, her king found itself in a rather spacious cage with no way out. Adrawbyperpetualcheck.

 

On the next day, it was already Alinasab who went for a continuation that theory does not exactly approve of. Muzychuk, following her sister’s game from the Ukrainian Championship of 2014, gained an advantage because of Black’s chronic pawn weaknesses and her king’s exposure. Subsequently, White loosened up the opponent’s position with her clever maneuvers and finished the matter with a combinational storm.

 

After the first day, it looked like А. Muzychuk was not going to have serious obstacles on her way to the next round. Her fifth consecutive championship win was a wipeout. The opening pattern was the same: playing Black in the Petrov Defense she was unaccustomed to, Stefanova turned off from mainstream highway to a side road for some reason  and lost control of her “vehicle.” She was late with developing her queenside pieces, then allowed white rooks to invade along the central file in a picturesque fashion and suffered great material losses.

 

A. Muzychuk – A. Stefanova

 

 

However, in the second game Muzychuk, after obtaining comfortable play, made several ill-considered moves on the kingside, slightly panicked and gave up a pawn. In the ending, she had chances for a draw but kept on playing nervously, and Stefanova realized her advantage.

In the first tiebreaker, the former World Champion’s rook got lost on the kingside, but Muzychuk chose a far-from-perfect continuation and had to return material presently, resigning herself to a draw.

With White, Stefanova entered a variation where she had lost a blitz game to Koneru once and stood worse as early as on the move 12. Later, hoping for her queen’s counterattacking sortie, she allowed black pieces to take threatening positions in the neighborhood of the white king’s residence but overlooked a powerful blow. Muzychuk mated in several moves.

 

Young Asian chess players keep on bringing pleasant surprises.

Tokhirjonova won her first game against Gunina after the latter, wishing to avoid from drawing continuations, allowed White to create a passed pawn and then to advance it with a decisive effect.

In the opening of the return game, the Uzbek girl made her opponent a present of both bishop pair and initiative and then temporarily sacrificed a pawn in the early middle game when her king’s position was insecure. It was more than enough for Gunina – after her breakthrough in the center, the opponent’s position crumbled.

Tokhirjonova won the opening battle in the first 25-minute game and gained an active setup. In order to finish development of her kingside, Gunina gave up a pawn and attempted to overtake the initiative with a bishop thrust.

 

G. Tokhirjonova – V. Gunina

 

 

By means of an exchange combination 21.Rxd7 Rxd7 22.Nc5! Ka8 (there is a threat of Na6+) 23.Bxd7 Bxc1 24.Bxe8 Bxe8 25.Qc3 (engine points out that 25.Qg8 is even stronger), White managed to retain her extra pawn and magnify her positional edge. Soon another tactical operation followed, after which queens disappeared from the board, and Black found herself two more pawns down.

Faced with necessity of striking back for a second time, Gunina launched an unprepared attack in the universally known Queen’s Indian tabia, and this tactics nearly scored a success for her. Having taken two pawns, Tokhirjonova neglected to take measures to secure her king’s safety, and White obtained a chance to continue her assault. However, Gunina immediately made a mistake of allowing another exchange combination. In the end of the forced variation, Black, by means of a clever trick, managed to retain both her material and positional advantage, so there was never a risk of her losing in the unequal battle that followed. With her final blunder, the Russian player allowed the black pawn to queen.

 

In the middle game of the first regular duel, Abdumalik carried out an unsuccessful knight’s transfer. Zawadzka gained an advantage that became decisive after a couple of other aimless Black’s moves and counterraid of white equestrian was far more effective.

In the second game, the Kazakh player played out the Ruy López in the spirit of the Danish Gambit. Zawadzka did not go for material gains and obtained a decent position, but in the interval from move 19 to 24, almost every her decision was at best second-rated. White activated her forces dramatically, regained the second of the sacrificed pawns and, after another error, set about harvesting.

In the first 25-minute game, Zawadzka played out the much-obliging Center Counter Defense, but neglected to develop her forces harmoniously. As a result, Abdumalik had a considerable edge by the move 15. She kept developing her initiative with strong and natural moves, and soon her opponent’s position became somewhat tragicomic.

 

Z. Abdumalik – J. Zawadzka

 

 

Black’s resistance did not last long.

In the next game, Abdumalik’s original treatment of the Scottish Opening allowed her to equalize quickly. Zawadzka’s exchange sacrifice did not work out for her, and so the character of the following struggle never left any doubt as to its favorable for Black outcome. Nevertheless, for one brief moment there was a glimpse of an off-screen variation that promised hope of a revenge to the Polish player.

 

Galliamova and Lei Tingjie quickly drew in both their regular games.

In the first tiebreaker, the Russian gained a solid spatial advantage, the importance of which decreased after all the knights had left the board. Then Lei lured her opponent with an exchange sacrifice and got free play as a compensation. White’s position became difficult for playing out in a rapid game, and a careless advance of her king resulted in a decisive loss of material.

Playing with Black, Galliamova kept provoking her opponent into demonstrating excessive activity, but never succeeded. She became overzealous and was left a pawn down without any compensation. Lei, in her turn, was nearly pulled down with her eagerness to simplify, but immediately after exchange of the queens that gave Black a chance to confuse the game, Galliamova committed her final error.

 

Kosteniuk had to work hard to neutralize Harika’s initiative in the first regular game. On the next day, the Indian managed to solve her problems with black color more easily.

After exchange of the queens in the first 25-minute game, the former World Champion eliminated the isolated black pawn, but Harika’s defense was so stubborn that White seemed unable to retain her last pawns on the board.

 

A. Kosteniuk – H. Dronavalli

 

 

To a draw led 57…Bb6, and 58.Bd4 is met with the bishop’s retreat along the diagonal а5-d8. Black chose a fundamentally different continuation.

57…h4? 58.Bd4 Bxd4. With bishops on the board, there is already no draw– 58…Bb8 59.b6 Kg3 60.Bf6!, and the only possibility to take the g2-pawn is to trade it for the h4 one.

59.Kxd4 Kg3 60.b6 Kxg2 61.b7 h3 62.b8Q h2. Black pawn is on the “correct” file; however, white king is too close to the scene.

63.Qb2+ Kg1 64.Ke3. After black queen appears on the board, White mates.

 

In the next game, Kosteniuk got tangled up in an even more inoffensive endgame and  the score was tied.

In the first 10-minute game, Harika failed to benefit from her far-advanced central pawn. Her rook was seven moves late with appearing on the d-file; during this time, her passed pawn had turned from an asset to a weakness, and Black was unable to hold the resultant rook endgame.

In the final game of the match, Kosteniuk, with her precise energetic moves, managed to retain the Catalan gambit pawn. She had lost a share of her advantage in the endgame, but Harika could only dream of a chance to win anyway.

 

Lagno and Pogonina were the first pair to go into blitz tie-breaks– and were unable to determine the winner even then.

The struggle in the first four games was level and not particularly colorful, so all of them ended in draws. In the second regular game, Lagno had an accidental opportunity to gain an advantage directly before control; Pogonina should have transposed into an endgame with a doubled extra pawn in the first 25-minute duel. With 10-minute control, slipups became more serious, but still both tiebreakers ended in draws.

The first blitz game was smoothly rolling to another peaceful harbor when Pogonina first gave up a pawn in the major-piece ending for no reason at all and then overlooked transition into a king-and-pawn one.

The return 5-minute game was full of blunders, which is both understandable and forgivable. Pogonina, who possessed the initiative, kept missing continuations that won instantly; Lagno kept wasting her drawing chances.

Here is only one (and final) episode for you:

 

N. Pogonina – K. Lagno

 

 

Several moves ago, White has automatically replied to а6-а5 with а2-а4; now it could have backfired on her after 65…Rg6 66.f7 Rg3+!

But Black chooses 65…Rb8? 66.f7 Rf8 67.Kh4. 1-0.

 

In the Armageddon game, luck was with Lagno who played White. After long Spanish maneuvers, she offered exchange of the queens that objectively led to a difficult endgame; more than that, she had practically none of her extra time left by that moment. However, the outside passed pawn created as a result of this exchange had the last say eventually.

Igor Lysyj: Coach is always responsible for the loss

   |   By  |  0 Comments

Grandmaster from Yekaterinburg helps Valentina Gunina, but is rarely seen in the playing hall. After all, he was invited not to show off, but to forge sharp opening weapons for his player.

– Igor, is it tough to be a coach?

– To begin with,  I consider myself a second, not a coach. In my opinion, there is a marked difference. A second helps his player during a competition or training camp, and works on openings only. A coach has a greater goal of improving the player’s overall skill. I have never coached anyone except myself.

– What is your responsibility here?

– Opening work. Obtaining comfortable positions as Black. There are many playable lines, but I need to pick those that suit my player’s style. As for playing White, I must find the lines that do not lead to a forced draw after the move 15. 

– Is today’s chess much different from what it was ten years ago?
– The main difference is in volume of information, which grows in geometric progression. For instance, a single line in the Nimzo-Indian Defense today requires as much time as the entire opening a decade ago. Also, building a base repertoire as Black is much easier than ever before.

– Why is that? Because the computers have improved?

– There are many more engines, and they’ve gotten stronger. Also, a high quality correspondence databases are now available. In before you had to discover a lot on your own, often through painful trial and error approach.

– So, the gap between strong and average grandmasters has diminished?
– Only in the opening. In the past elite players were far ahead, but now one can get much closer to them through high quality work with the computer. Modern players understand promising and unpromising directions of play much better.

– What about other stages of the game?

– Well, this revolution had nearly no influence on the middlegame. As soon as the players, even elite grandmasters, begin to play on their own, they make mistakes on nearly every move.

 

– To sum up, the computers help us finding the best moves quicker…

– Not the best moves, no. The computers help us avoiding bad moves, we aren’t wasting time on those anymore. However, finding the most promising and also sensible move from the list of acceptable ones is, according to Emil Sutovsky (and I agree with him), a true test of skill of a chess analyst.

– How often do you pass this test?

– Sometimes I manage to discover something interesting. Once I showed a fresh idea in the Chinese League. In half a year Karjakin used it against Anand in the Candidates tournament and won a good game. Almost immediately the idea was employed by a hundred players!

– How deeply do you have to dig? Are we talking about improvements beyond the 20th move? Or earlier?

– It is better to find a new idea as early as possible. Recently the London System became fashionable, the 1.Nf3 d5 2.e3opening is also gaining popularity, and so on. However, sometimes one can find new ideas in well-developed schemes.

– How do you find where to look?

– We all have our inner compass, positional understanding, and intuition that relies upon our analytical experience.

– And how do you decide whether a certain idea will work for your player?
– It’s simple – she must understand the ideas behind maneuvers, know things to desire and to fear.

 

– Does the player have a say in picking the opening line?

– Of course, this is totally her responsibility. She knows her likes and dislikes better than anyone. However, even if I do a good job, but the result of the game is unsatisfactory, I do not feel particularly pleased. 

– Who is responsible for the loss?

– Coach is always responsible for the loss. And the player is the one to take a credit for a win.

– What happens if the player does not like the line you prepared?

– I can always offer it to someone else or use it myself. However, usually you begin to understand your  player’s favorite type of positions fairly quickly, after a couple of days of intensive work.

Our approach must always be based on the player’s personality. Sometimes you should analyze everything together, sometimes you do the work yourself and send the analysis with detailed explanations – there is no substitute to words. Sending computer lines without human annotations in totally inefficient.

– How do they manage to memorize everything?

– Some people have better memory than others, but it is always easier to remember something explained with words. Bare variations are nearly impossible to memorize.

– What is the most satisfying moment in your work?

– When the game is finished, the result is right, your player did everything you had planned, and the opponent made a mistake you had expected. Then you realize you’ve made an impact.

– How important for a coach to be near the player?

– Sometimes I work via Skype, and the difference in my efficiency is huge. When you are near the player, it is often sufficient to look in her eyes to realize whether she understands you or not.

 

Round 3 of world championship is over

  |   By  |  0 Comments

The tie-break of the Women’s World Championship was played on November 11 in Khanty-Mansiysk.

The 19-year-old Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova surprisingly defeated the higher rated Valentina Gunina. Tokhirjonova won both rapid games in sharp tactical struggle, which is usually considered Gunina’s territory.

Lei Tingjie was stronger than Alisa Galliamova in both 25-minute games and advanced to the Quarterfinal.

Anna Muzychuk and Antoaneta Stefanova drew their first game. In the second game Muzychuk played Black and celebrated a victory, joining her sister at the next stage.

Zhansaya Abdumalik convincingly defeated Jolanta Zawadzka in the first game, and secured a draw from the position of strength in the second game. The player from Kazakhstan is also in the Quarterfinal.

Alexandra Kosteniuk outplayed Harika Dronavalli in the first rapid game, but did not manage to hold a slightly worse endgame in the second one. In 10+10 blitz games the Russian was stronger in the first game and confidently drew the second one, thus advancing to the 4th round.

Natalija Pogonina and Kateryna Lagno produced the first Armageddon at the Championship. They made two draws in rapid chess and moved on to blitz. Long blitz games brought another two draws. In 5+3 games the players exchanged blows: Natalija lost the first game, but showed her famous fighting spirit and came back in the second one. In the “sudden death” game Kateryna Lagno took White and managed to outplay her opponent in the endgame.

Quarterfinal pairings:

Ju Wenjun – Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova

Mariya Muzychuk – Zhansaya Abdumalik

Kateryna Lagno – Lei Tingjie

Alexandra Kosteniuk – Anna Muzychuk

Pairings and results

Photos

Video

Lei Tingjie: I was very lucky in the first rapid game

   |   By  |  0 Comments

An interview with Lei Tingjie of China after her victory over Alisa Galliamova from Russia in the tie-break of Round 3 of Women’s World Championship:

Tingjie, what happened in this tie-break?

– I was very lucky in the first rapid game. I think I had a worse position but my opponent was in time trouble and made a blunder. I also managed to win the second game, so I qualified for the next round.

– What can you say about your play here so far? Do you like your games?

– The quality of games is all right, but I am a little bit tired right now because this is a very tough tournament.

– What is your best result in such knock-out events?

– This is my second time to play in this tournament. I played four years ago in Sochi but I lost to Humpy Koneru in the second round. So this time I am doing much better and just enjoy playing chess.

– You are very young. Are you a chess professional, or do you study at the University?

– I went to the University in Shanghai this September to study business management, but I pay attention to both chess and studies.

 

Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova: It’s a great tournament for me to improve and I enjoy it

   |   By  |  0 Comments

Interview with the 19-year-old Gulrukhbegim Tokhirjonova (Uzbekistan).

– Gulrukhbegim, please tell us about the tie-break match with Valentina Gunina.

– Today’s match was quite good for me. I managed to win first game with the white pieces and after that she tried to win the second game, of course. I think shouldn’t have done it. She started to play very actively, pushing the h-pawn. I think it was wrong so I managed to win the second one also.

– In a regular part of the match, you won the first game and then you lost the second sone. What was your emotional state before the tie-break?

– After the win, I played very badly the second game so I deserved to lose it. That’s why I didn’t think about it before the tie-break. I just played and I did my best today.

– You have played three matches with very strong opponents – Alina Kashlinskaya, a former world champion Tan  Zhongyi,  and Valentina Gunina. Which match was the toughest one for you?

– I don’t know. Three of them all are very strong chess players. Maybe with Tan it was a little bit more difficult because we played two draws and I didn’t know how it all would be in rapid games, because it was my first tie-break in this tournament. That one was a little bit more difficult than others, I think.

– As far as I know this is your first World Championship, so what are your impressions of the playing hall, the venue, your games etc?

– The playing hall is great. It’s very exciting to play here. My opponents are strong and tomorrow I will play with Ju Wenjun. It’s a great tournament for me to improve and I enjoy it.

– And what do you think about Khanty-Mansiysk?

– It’s a little bit cold for me because we still have autumn in Tashkent.  But Khanty-Mansiysk is beautiful with its everyday snow.

Ruslan Scherbakov: One should not get fixated on the opening alone

  |   By  |  0 Comments

The graduate and trainer of the famous Panchenko School Ruslan Scherbakov got lucky – his student is eager to work hard. Even after Dinara Saduakassova got eliminated from the World Championship, she only gave her coach three free days.

– Ruslan, you are a player of classical upbringing. What can you say about modern chess?

– It has changed quite a lot, to put it mildly. We have a lot less time to sleep and need to work constantly. General recommendations no longer cut it, people need exact assessments and concrete ideas. Everyone works on the computer, and the overall level of play has lifted up considerably. If you don’t work as hard as the others, you will be punished.

– Do you approve these changes?

– In general, I don’t like them. I prefer the old times with more human thought and ideas. The computer taught players to defend properly, it helps to solve problems faster, it demands precision. Also, thanks to the computer, the players grew more critical of their opponents’ moves. They don’t trust human judgment as much as before!

– Did the computer change any fundamental ideas about the game?

– The most important things remain the same – development, importance of the center, king’s safety. Some strategic aspects have evolved, and everything became much more concrete, from the very start of the game.

Rusland Scherbakov in the centre

– What is the key part of the preparation?

– Professionals mainly work on their openings. Also each opponent is being scrutinized: what does she play, where she can go, where we can lay a trap, which positions are causing discomfort for her… My task is to give my players comfortable positions that are uncomfortable for their opponents.

– How do you distinguish between promising and unpromising lines?

– Our judgment has been strongly influenced by the computer. In the past many positions were dropped off because they did not look safe; now you can not afford to rely on your gut – everything must be proven by concrete analysis. Therefore, we must not trust our first impression. Even a dangerous looking position may in fact be quite playable. And the list of those grows each year.

– But many openings are no longer played!

– Right, but many more have returned to life! Especially in rapid chess, where people often play very suspiciously looking lines and get away with it. People dig deeper and work harder than ever.

1987. Photo: V. Levitin

– What else do you do as a coach at this tournament?

– During the event it is too late to fix general strategy. It is time for such things as offering tactical puzzles and analyzing games.

– What makes you think you did your job right?

– I did the job right when my player is confident at every stage of the game, from a complicated opening to a technical endgame. One should not get fixated on the opening alone, although many players spend up to 80% of their effort preparing.

– Do you usually work at the tournaments in person or prefer long distance help?

– Usually I work from home, using Skype. However, no matter how much you try, it is impossible to do some things when you are not present personally, when you feel your player much better and find the right words much quicker.

– Do you follow the games from the playing hall?

– No; you cannot help, but you can hurt. The player can easily get nervous, misreading your face. When I am in the playing hall, I normally don’t even look at my player.

– You work with both men and women. Is there a difference?

– I mostly work with women. They require much more detailed explanation of variations and ideas. Men absorb information quicker, understand it more clearly, remember and utilize the ideas more efficiently. Top female players, by the way, play much tougher chess, more like men’s.

When discussing openings, you can share your doubts with men, but doing it with women is not advisable, because they may lose confidence, which will adversely affect their play. You should compliment women much more, tell them they did everything right – especially if this was not the case! It will help them believe in themselves. Men cannot care less about such things, and if you try complimenting them, they will look at you suspiciously. They aren’t that bothered about criticism, too.

– What is your impression of Dinara Saduakassova?

– She has good potential, but obviously needs to work a lot. She always does everything properly and gives everything away at the board, no matter how difficult is the situation. She never gives up; in Khanty-Mansiysk she saved two very difficult positions. Looking at them, I was thinking I’d have hard time defending, despite I have always been considered a very good defender. For such student I really want to do my best!

– Did you feel sad when she got eliminated that early?

– I did. However, it is not a tragedy. Her time will come. I like that Dinara always wants to work more. I barely persuaded her to give me a couple of days off after the championship! Such approach is the best way to success.

Zhansaya Abdumalik: This is my first World Championship and I am happy with my games

   |   By  |  0 Comments

An interview with Zhansaya Abdumalik of Kazakhstan after her victory over Jolanta Zawadzka from Poland in the second game of Round 3 of the Women’s World Championship:

– Zhansaya, what was going on in the second game?

– Actually, in the opening I didn’t prepare the line with 4…d6 move in this variation of the Ruy Lopez so I played 5. d4 but it happened to be a wrong move so I lost a pawn. But then I got some advantage and just tried to play my best because it was the main game for me. If I lost or drew I would just stop playing here. That’s why I tried to push.

– Where do you think you started to outplay your opponent?

– I think after I played 17. Rd1. I didn’t know how to get some chances to attack my opponent for the lost pawn. So I just made normal moves. I think she was a little bit nervous because the position wasn’t really all right for her because her kind got stuck on e8 she couldn’t make a castle for a long time which led to problems. But after that she played 20…Qf6, which is a wrong move. I think 20…Nd7 and 21…Rf8 would be better. I just played 21. Qb3, and the pawn on e6 became a little bit weak so I was happy after 20…Qf6.

– How did you manage to prepare yourself psychologically for this game after the loss?

– Actually, I didn’t really get prepared. I thought: OK, I have the white colour so I just have to show what I can. I just played my best.

– What are your impressions on your playing here?

– I am playing fine. In some games, it could be better but this is my first Women’s World Championship and I am happy with my games. Hopefully, tomorrow I will win. I will try.